Stat |
Rank |
Date |
Comment |
|
1/40 |
05-25-09 |
3D in 2D saves about 3 seconds, but wasn't used in this run |
|
1/50 |
09-08-10 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/29 |
02-19-09 |
This was nice, until I accidently homing attacked a third pole at the end, which could be cleared in 2 poles. 1:14:xx last check |
|
1/45 |
10-07-09 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/42 |
06-21-09 |
Sub 1:30 after 18 total hours of gameplay, thanks to 3D in 2D |
|
1/32 |
03-10-09 |
Nice. Shortly after I got this, I found another trick that can potentially save a few seconds. Sub-1:30 possible, maybe? |
|
1/46 |
12-29-09 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/43 |
08-01-09 |
Sub 1:30 after 18 total hours of gameplay, thanks to 3D in 2D |
|
1/22 |
01-17-09 |
Everything worked out fine |
|
1/46 |
05-06-10 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/26 |
01-19-09 |
This was nice, until I accidently homing attacked a third pole at the end, which could be cleared in 2 poles. 1:14:xx last check |
|
1/37 |
05-15-09 |
3D in 2D saves about 3 seconds, but wasn't used in this run |
|
1/49 |
07-14-10 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/30 |
01-29-09 |
This was nice, until I accidently homing attacked a third pole at the end, which could be cleared in 2 poles. 1:14:xx last check |
|
1/40 |
05-30-09 |
3D in 2D saves about 3 seconds, but wasn't used in this run |
|
1/29 |
02-20-09 |
This was nice, until I accidently homing attacked a third pole at the end, which could be cleared in 2 poles. 1:14:xx last check |
|
1/44 |
10-13-09 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/42 |
06-22-09 |
Sub 1:30 after 18 total hours of gameplay, thanks to 3D in 2D |
|
1/32 |
03-10-09 |
Nice. Shortly after I got this, I found another trick that can potentially save a few seconds. Sub-1:30 possible, maybe? |
|
1/46 |
01-07-10 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/23 |
01-18-09 |
Everything worked out fine |
|
1/34 |
03-22-09 |
3D in 2D saves about 3 seconds, but wasn't used in this run |
|
1/47 |
05-22-10 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/27 |
01-20-09 |
This was nice, until I accidently homing attacked a third pole at the end, which could be cleared in 2 poles. 1:14:xx last check |
|
1/37 |
05-15-09 |
3D in 2D saves about 3 seconds, but wasn't used in this run |
|
1/50 |
08-17-10 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/29 |
01-31-09 |
This was nice, until I accidently homing attacked a third pole at the end, which could be cleared in 2 poles. 1:14:xx last check |
|
1/41 |
05-31-09 |
3D in 2D saves about 3 seconds, but wasn't used in this run |
|
1/29 |
02-20-09 |
This was nice, until I accidently homing attacked a third pole at the end, which could be cleared in 2 poles. 1:14:xx last check |
|
1/44 |
10-29-09 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/43 |
07-01-09 |
Sub 1:30 after 18 total hours of gameplay, thanks to 3D in 2D |
|
1/32 |
03-12-09 |
Nice. Shortly after I got this, I found another trick that can potentially save a few seconds. Sub-1:30 possible, maybe? |
|
1/46 |
02-18-10 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/23 |
01-18-09 |
Everything worked out fine |
|
1/35 |
04-03-09 |
3D in 2D saves about 3 seconds, but wasn't used in this run |
|
1/48 |
06-14-10 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/27 |
01-22-09 |
This was nice, until I accidently homing attacked a third pole at the end, which could be cleared in 2 poles. 1:14:xx last check |
|
1/37 |
05-18-09 |
3D in 2D saves about 3 seconds, but wasn't used in this run |
|
1/50 |
08-19-10 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/29 |
02-03-09 |
This was nice, until I accidently homing attacked a third pole at the end, which could be cleared in 2 poles. 1:14:xx last check |
|
1/44 |
08-08-09 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/42 |
05-31-09 |
3D in 2D saves about 3 seconds, but wasn't used in this run |
|
1/30 |
02-24-09 |
This was nice, until I accidently homing attacked a third pole at the end, which could be cleared in 2 poles. 1:14:xx last check |
|
1/45 |
11-25-09 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/44 |
07-04-09 |
Sub 1:30 after 18 total hours of gameplay, thanks to 3D in 2D |
|
1/20 |
01-09-09 |
I hate drifting :( |
|
1/47 |
02-22-10 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/24 |
01-19-09 |
Everything worked out fine |
|
1/35 |
04-06-09 |
3D in 2D saves about 3 seconds, but wasn't used in this run |
|
1/49 |
06-14-10 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/38 |
05-19-09 |
3D in 2D saves about 3 seconds, but wasn't used in this run |
|
1/50 |
08-21-10 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/30 |
02-03-09 |
This was nice, until I accidently homing attacked a third pole at the end, which could be cleared in 2 poles. 1:14:xx last check |
|
1/44 |
09-03-09 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/42 |
06-20-09 |
Sub 1:30 after 18 total hours of gameplay, thanks to 3D in 2D |
|
1/30 |
02-28-09 |
Found 2 new small timesavers, only used 1 though, thanks PoT for the vid. |
|
1/45 |
11-30-09 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/44 |
07-05-09 |
Sub 1:30 after 18 total hours of gameplay, thanks to 3D in 2D |
|
1/20 |
01-10-09 |
I hate drifting :( |
|
1/47 |
03-03-10 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/44 |
08-04-09 |
Tons of minor mistakes, but at least the 3D in 2D went fine, which was a first. |
|
1/25 |
01-19-09 |
Everything worked out fine |
|
1/35 |
04-13-09 |
3D in 2D saves about 3 seconds, but wasn't used in this run |
|
1/48 |
06-15-10 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/28 |
01-27-09 |
This was nice, until I accidently homing attacked a third pole at the end, which could be cleared in 2 poles. 1:14:xx last check |
|
1/38 |
05-21-09 |
3D in 2D saves about 3 seconds, but wasn't used in this run |
|
1/50 |
08-23-10 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/29 |
02-03-09 |
This was nice, until I accidently homing attacked a third pole at the end, which could be cleared in 2 poles. 1:14:xx last check |
|
1/44 |
09-06-09 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/42 |
06-21-09 |
Sub 1:30 after 18 total hours of gameplay, thanks to 3D in 2D |
|
1/30 |
03-02-09 |
Nice. Shortly after I got this, I found another trick that can potentially save a few seconds. Sub-1:30 possible, maybe? |
|
1/45 |
12-16-09 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/43 |
07-10-09 |
Sub 1:30 after 18 total hours of gameplay, thanks to 3D in 2D |
|
1/20 |
01-14-09 |
failed to use a shortcut that skips hitting the spring, landing on the platform by moving left, then attacking the flamethrower, but this is still sub-1:40 |
|
1/47 |
04-10-10 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
1:22:35 |
1/44 |
08-05-09 |
|
|
1/26 |
01-19-09 |
Everything worked out fine |
|
1/36 |
04-21-09 |
3D in 2D saves about 3 seconds, but wasn't used in this run |
|
1/49 |
06-27-10 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/29 |
01-27-09 |
This was nice, until I accidently homing attacked a third pole at the end, which could be cleared in 2 poles. 1:14:xx last check |
|
1/40 |
05-24-09 |
3D in 2D saves about 3 seconds, but wasn't used in this run |
|
1/51 |
09-03-10 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/30 |
02-07-09 |
This was nice, until I accidently homing attacked a third pole at the end, which could be cleared in 2 poles. 1:14:xx last check |
|
1/45 |
09-13-09 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/42 |
06-21-09 |
Sub 1:30 after 18 total hours of gameplay, thanks to 3D in 2D |
|
1/30 |
03-06-09 |
Nice. Shortly after I got this, I found another trick that can potentially save a few seconds. Sub-1:30 possible, maybe? |
|
1/45 |
12-19-09 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/44 |
07-22-09 |
Sub 1:30 after 18 total hours of gameplay, thanks to 3D in 2D |
|
1/21 |
01-15-09 |
failed to use a shortcut that skips hitting the spring, landing on the platform by moving left, then attacking the flamethrower, but this is still sub-1:40 |
|
1/47 |
04-12-10 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/27 |
01-19-09 |
Everything worked out fine |
|
1/36 |
04-26-09 |
3D in 2D saves about 3 seconds, but wasn't used in this run |
|
1/48 |
06-30-10 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/29 |
01-27-09 |
This was nice, until I accidently homing attacked a third pole at the end, which could be cleared in 2 poles. 1:14:xx last check |
|
1/39 |
05-24-09 |
3D in 2D saves about 3 seconds, but wasn't used in this run |
|
1/50 |
09-03-10 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/30 |
02-09-09 |
This was nice, until I accidently homing attacked a third pole at the end, which could be cleared in 2 poles. 1:14:xx last check |
|
1/45 |
09-27-09 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/42 |
06-21-09 |
Sub 1:30 after 18 total hours of gameplay, thanks to 3D in 2D |
|
1/31 |
03-06-09 |
Nice. Shortly after I got this, I found another trick that can potentially save a few seconds. Sub-1:30 possible, maybe? |
|
1/46 |
12-29-09 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/43 |
07-25-09 |
Sub 1:30 after 18 total hours of gameplay, thanks to 3D in 2D |
|
1/21 |
01-16-09 |
Everything worked out fine |
|
1/47 |
04-19-10 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/27 |
01-19-09 |
This was nice, until I accidently homing attacked a third pole at the end, which could be cleared in 2 poles. 1:14:xx last check |
|
1/37 |
05-13-09 |
3D in 2D saves about 3 seconds, but wasn't used in this run |
|
1/49 |
07-13-10 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
1/29 |
01-29-09 |
This was nice, until I accidently homing attacked a third pole at the end, which could be cleared in 2 poles. 1:14:xx last check |
|
2/64 |
08-03-12 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
2/34 |
03-21-09 |
Nice. Shortly after I got this, I found another trick that can potentially save a few seconds. Sub-1:30 possible, maybe? |
|
2/61 |
12-28-11 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
2/44 |
08-02-09 |
Sub 1:30 after 18 total hours of gameplay, thanks to 3D in 2D |
|
2/57 |
08-10-11 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
2/44 |
08-03-09 |
Sub 1:30 after 18 total hours of gameplay, thanks to 3D in 2D |
|
2/57 |
08-18-11 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
2/32 |
03-12-09 |
Nice. Shortly after I got this, I found another trick that can potentially save a few seconds. Sub-1:30 possible, maybe? |
|
2/44 |
08-04-09 |
vids make it look so easy :( |
|
2/57 |
08-24-11 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
2/32 |
03-16-09 |
Nice. Shortly after I got this, I found another trick that can potentially save a few seconds. Sub-1:30 possible, maybe? |
|
2/58 |
09-01-11 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
2/32 |
03-16-09 |
Nice. Shortly after I got this, I found another trick that can potentially save a few seconds. Sub-1:30 possible, maybe? |
|
2/58 |
09-19-11 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
2/32 |
03-17-09 |
Nice. Shortly after I got this, I found another trick that can potentially save a few seconds. Sub-1:30 possible, maybe? |
1:22:35 |
2/44 |
08-06-09 |
|
|
2/59 |
11-21-11 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
2/33 |
03-20-09 |
Nice. Shortly after I got this, I found another trick that can potentially save a few seconds. Sub-1:30 possible, maybe? |
|
2/60 |
12-04-11 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
1:49:50 |
3/19 |
01-08-09 |
|
|
3/65 |
08-27-12 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
1:49:50 |
3/16 |
12-31-08 |
|
|
3/65 |
08-27-12 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
1:49:50 |
3/16 |
01-01-09 |
|
|
3/65 |
08-28-12 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
1:49:50 |
3/17 |
01-01-09 |
|
|
3/66 |
09-11-12 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
1:49:50 |
3/17 |
01-04-09 |
|
|
3/67 |
09-11-12 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
1:49:50 |
3/18 |
01-04-09 |
|
|
3/66 |
09-15-12 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
1:49:50 |
3/18 |
01-05-09 |
|
|
3/66 |
09-16-12 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
1:49:50 |
3/18 |
01-06-09 |
|
|
3/65 |
08-25-12 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
4/67 |
11-12-12 |
|
1:54:49 |
5/16 |
12-31-08 |
|
|
5/71 |
05-22-13 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
1:54:49 |
5/15 |
12-29-08 |
|
|
5/71 |
05-01-13 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
1:54:49 |
5/15 |
12-29-08 |
|
|
5/72 |
05-22-13 |
I wanted sub-1:20 :( |
|
6/76 |
08-23-13 |
|
|
7/79 |
01-14-14 |
|
|
8/80 |
01-15-14 |
|
|
9/80 |
01-18-14 |
|
|
10/80 |
02-08-14 |
|
|
11/82 |
04-24-14 |
|
|
12/83 |
07-26-14 |
|
|
13/83 |
06-11-14 |
|
|
14/88 |
11-06-14 |
|
|
15/94 |
04-13-15 |
|
|
16/96 |
10-12-15 |
|
|
17/99 |
06-01-16 |
|
|
18/102 |
02-13-17 |
|
|
19/103 |
03-18-17 |
|
|
20/108 |
02-16-19 |
|
|
21/106 |
07-31-17 |
|